Sunday, May 31, 2009

Walt Whitman at 190: A difficult oracle



" 'Have you read the American poems by Whitman?' Van Gogh wrote to his sister-in-law in September 1888. 'I am sure Theo has them, and I strongly advise you to read them, because to begin with they are very fine, and the English speak about them a good deal. He sees in the future, and even in the present, a world of healthy, carnal love, strong and frank -- of friendship -- of work -- under the great starlit vault of heaven ... At first it makes you smile, it is all so candid and pure; but it sets you thinking for the same reason.' "

-- from the essay "Walt Whitman," by Guy Davenport,
in The Geography of the Imagination.

This May 31 is the 190th anniversary of Walt Whitman's birth. He remains the singular American poetic invention even as the world he inhabited fades further from view. When Leaves of Grass was originally published in 1855, the United States was largely an agrarian country building toward civil war whose image of itself was still mostly Calvinist in its outlook, and a land where "the future" was filled with unprecedented change. He lived from the age of buckboard to railroad; Robert Fulton invented the steamboat the year Whitman was born, and he died the year Ellis Island accepted its first immigrants. Thomas Edison had invented the incandescent light bulb 13 years before. Imagine that.

Guy Davenport, in his book of essays The Geography of the Imagination, calls Whitman a symbol of American idealism "as bright and in many ways more articulate than Jefferson or Jackson." Yet his reputation these days seems more dim and more remote than ever. In some ways, Davenport suggests, this is because Whitman's poetic stride, the multitudes his poems contain, makes him a difficult figure to measure in full. Even the poets in the generation immediately following Whitman found his multifaceted catalogues too inclusive:

"Whitman, Yeats complained, was bad for the American spirit because it seemed to him that we indulged all too naturally in what Whitman urged us to wallow. (Max) Beerbohm caricatured this view of Whitman ('... inciting the American eagle to soar'), and the young Ezra Pound in his Pre-Raphaelite suit thought Whitman much too much, while intelligently suspecting that there was something there that that the critics weren't seeing."



More to the point, Whitman -- for all he has become in the American imagination, an almost mythological figure -- is still unmeasured because he changes form for each successive generation. He was not a poet of identifiable school -- no Transcendentalist, no singular Romantic strain, no Theosophist (he celebrated the triumphs of Man as much as the wonders of God). As Davenport writes,

"Young admirers fancied him an American Socrates, but of course he is the exact opposite. He was like those Greeks in love with the immediate, the caressable (always with the eye) and the delicious, who to St. Paul's distress, worshipped each other when free from placating and begging from a confusion of gods."

And there's the problem with Whitman these days: his disappearing wilderness (and his all-encompassing wildness) overwhelms the current American earnestness. The same free-spirited attitudes and easygoing American approaches that are hallmarks of his poems (and which are admired by readers around the world as essentially American) make Whitman a difficult oracle. As his country was displaced by industry, oil, and the railroad -- the very ingenuity he celebrated -- it became ever harder to see the country Whitman himself had seen, if it had indeed existed at all:

"In the distance the flowing glaze, the breast of the river, with a wind-dapple here and there;
With ranging hills on the banks, with many a line against the sky, and shadows;
And the city at hand, with dwellings so dense, and stacks of chimneys,
And all the scenes of life, and the workshops, and the workmen homeward returning."

(from "When Lilacs Last in the Dooryard Bloom'd")


The national fracture that was the Civil War only escalated the end of agrarian America, and brought an end to the poet's bucolic vision of the country as essentially pure and even innocent, if not cohesive. If Whitman is read in schools these days it is most likely his rhyming trope of the Lincoln assassination, "O Captain! My Captain!" that resounds, rather than the far darker and more epic "When Lilacs Last in the Dooryard Bloom'd," and his Calamus poems -- with the intent "to sing no songs to-day but those of manly attachment" -- remain the Apocrypha of American poetry.

Still there is essentially a feeling that something irretrievable has passed in Whitman's poetry, a national ease of spirit that industrial America can not recover. Davenport again: "Of the delights mentioned in 'A Song of Joys' most are accessible now only to the very rich, some are obsolete, some are so exploited by commerce as to be no longer joys for anybody except the stockbroker, two are against the law (swimming naked, sleeping with 'grown and part-grown boys'), and one is lethal ('the solitary walk.')"

Against such a catalogue of the currently lost and the forbidden in America, it hardly seems that we could be the same country, and indeed Whitman is as much suspect now as he was in the nineteenth century. (Emerson took pains to say he was not a close friend of Whitman's). Many disassociated themselves with the poet and his poetry even as they read his words, and civic pride had repeatedly to be adjusted in the naming of bridges and monuments in his honor over the objections of hometown patriots that his morals were "un-American."

Yet Walt Whitman remains inextricably, exuberantly American. In the rhyme and breath of his poetry the country he imagined still lives, and a good-natured democracy is possible; that is the power of his words. The nation he saw is yet building, and his country remains ours as well, difficult as it may be to discern. "Eventually," Mr. Davenport writes in his essay, "he will shame us into becoming Americans again." We have only to listen.

"And the running blackberry would adorn the parlors of heaven,
And the narrowest hinge in my hand puts to scorn all machinery,

And the cow crunching with depress'd head surpasses any statue,

And a mouse is miracle enough to stagger sextillions of infidels."

(from
Leaves of Grass, 1855)

Friday, May 29, 2009

"Walt Whitman's Hands" (1982)

I have the honor of being born on the same day as Walt Whitman. This weekend marks the 190th birthday of Whitman (and I turn 57 -- a long way to go). A few poetic words seemed in order; here are some from 1982, when I was a mere wordsmith of 30. The poem remains unpublished until now.


Walt Whitman's Hands
M. Bromberg, 1982

This is the land Walt Whitman made
with his own hands, roughly and eagerly.
He built his cities of strongest iron,
yet with a tinker's eye and economy.
These mountains are his gentle mountains
their soft curves a woman's reclining mood
or a soldier's ease at rest.
He saw stands of pine, straight and green,
saw locomotives crossing flatbed West.


His hands were not a poet's alabaster,
writing odes to king or cunning dark.
His lines were sinew, flesh and blood
were in them, a surprising human spark.
His was the telegraph, the railroad, the prairie open wide,
and a people with marvelous ambition.
Prairie farmer or city dweller he loved them both;
above them all, stars to fill the canopy of heaven.


When Whitman prayed he prayed to God and Man.
They were equals. No War was just
where sons and fathers died as one
beseeching God, and who with failing breath
hailed death their priceless victory. He cried.
The ground bled, the ground shook
where brother and brother were laid aside.
No War nor wounding sorrow
could stop a nation's building, or stay
the stars from turning in their courses.

Now the young men Whitman would embrace,
each one, are buried under stone,
joined once more in a last great confederacy.
At Gettysburg's ground, in the far camps of Elmira
the land is whole again,
the fields where they died are fair again
with flower and clover and soft grass.

This is the land Walt Whitman made.
There are places still where the barns and pastures
are as real as the stalks of wheat,
and where the skies are still blue.
The poet's mark is on the mountains,
his voice is with us yet:
his land is ours.
It is our strength, his testament.

Monday, May 25, 2009

Happy Memorial Day!

Friday, May 22, 2009

Sid Laverents, 1908-2009

Sid Laverents, who was a unique and inventive amateur filmmaker for fifty years, died on May 6. Here is his obituary from The New York Times. A ten-minute piece featuring his multi-part magnum opus, The Sid Saga, was presented on Egg (PBS) in 2002.

Sid Laverents, Auteur of Homemade Films, Dies at 100
By BRUCE WEBER
Published: May 16, 2009

Sid Laverents, who started making movies in his Southern California basement after he turned 50 and became perhaps the most celebrated hobbyist in the amateur film world, his resourceful and dryly giddy work chosen for the National Film Registry, died on May 6 in Chula Vista, Calif. He was 100 and lived in Bonita, Calif., near San Diego.

The cause was pneumonia, said his wife, Charlotte.

Mr. Laverents was a jack of many trades, a perpetual self-inventor. He played a dozen instruments and supported himself through the Depression as a vaudevillian one-man band; he was also a sheet metal worker who helped build World War II airplanes, a self-published writer, a Fuller Brush salesman, a sign painter, a carpenter and an aircraft engineer.

But he was best known for the more than 20 movies he made from 1959 until his death, as a member of the San Diego Amateur Moviemakers Club. They included nature films (one about snails, filmed in his backyard), goofy comedies ( “It Sudses and Sudses and Sudses,” a “Sorcerer’s Apprentice”-like tale about canisters of shaving cream run amok in the bathroom) and deadpan autobiographical stories, including “The Sid Saga,” a four-part look at his own life, completed in his 80s.

Mr. Laverents had long been known to cineastes, members of amateur film clubs and other connoisseurs of noncommercial filmmaking, but in 2000, at 92, he got wider recognition after his “Multiple SIDosis” was included in the National Film Registry, a list of movies selected for preservation in the Library of Congress by the National Film Preservation Board. It is one of a handful of amateur works so designated, including the Zapruder film of the Kennedy assassination.

“We selected it to honor all the many terrific films produced by amateur cinĂ© club filmmakers throughout the U.S. over the years,” said Stephen Leggett, project coordinator for the preservation board. “The film is technically quite adept and inventive, amusingly droll and quite mesmerizing to those who see it.”

And so it is. Nine minutes long, “Multiple SIDosis” stars Mr. Laverents himself, and it begins as he opens a Christmas gift from his wife at the time, Adelaide: a recording device. For the rest of the film, Mr. Laverents puts to use not just the recorder but also his background as a one-man band, knitting together a soundtrack of several separate recordings of himself performing a jaunty Felix Arndt tune called “Nola.” He whistles, hums, blows across bottlenecks and plays instruments, including a banjo, a jew’s-harp and an ocarina.

It’s a witty performance, but what is really unusual is the imagery that accompanies the music. Using repeated exposures of the same piece of film, Mr. Laverents kept adding different shots of himself playing the different musical lines. By the end, there are 11 different Sids on the screen, including a couple wearing Mickey Mouse ears and fake whiskers.

The skill, patience and fastidiousness of the filmmaking is extraordinary. Not only did Mr. Laverents perform all the individual parts beautifully, but because he was re-exposing the same piece of film again and again to layer on the next part, if he made a mistake on the eighth run-through, say, he had to begin again. This 1970 film took him four years to finish.

“What raises his work to a higher level is the deep ingenuity he brings to the minimal tools he has,” said Ross Lipman, a film restorationist at the Film and Television Archive at the University of California, Los Angeles, which is in the process of preserving Mr. Laverents’s films, including “The Sid Saga.” “He designed and hand-built his own equipment that allowed him to synchronize the sound and the pictures while he was doing all these backwindings and rerecordings.”

Sidney Nicklas Laverents was born in Cheyenne, Wyo., on Aug. 5, 1908. His father, Paul, was a real estate speculator who moved the family frequently in search of a boom; young Sidney graduated from high school in Florida, where his father, at one point, operated a theater. His mother, Edith Davis, taught him piano. He also took drum lessons, and by the mid-1920s, he had taught himself ukulele, banjo and harmonica and had devised ways to play pie-plate cymbals with his elbows and a woodblock using a string, meanwhile strumming the banjo or the uke. He became a traveling musician after he met a father and son who did an escape act at his own father’s theater.

Mr. Laverents moved to San Diego in 1941 and did sheet metal work at Consolidated Aircraft. He was drafted in 1943 and sent to Calcutta to build and repair planes. He returned to Consolidated Aircraft after the war (it later merged with Vultee Aircraft and became known as Convair) and continued working there through 1967. He also studied engineering at San Diego State College, and in 1959, Charlotte Laverents said, “he was bitten by the film bug.”

Mr. Laverents was twice divorced and once widowed. Mrs. Laverents, whom he met through a personal ad and married in 1991, is his only survivor.

His impulse to create lasted nearly until his death. Last August Mr. Lipman and others held a 100th-birthday celebration in Los Angeles for Mr. Laverents, who worried that his declining health would keep him from attending. It didn’t.

“But he made an apology video,” Mr. Lipman said. “In case he couldn’t make it.”

Thursday, May 14, 2009

"About the Author": A birthday poem (5/31/1952)



















About the Author

M. Bromberg


I know average stuff for my height
and I've learned some few things
I've even remembered a couple
that experience brings:
That if you're not careful
ether explodes with a spark,
and I know how to take
other folks' clothes off in the dark -- that's prety handy.

I know you can put your head through a windshield,
that it's not so easy jumping from trains,
and sooner or later you'll know someone
who decides to blow out their brains.
I met Little Richard at Cumberland Mall
who told me I ought to preach the Lord's call.
And it was more fun to be drunk
at the Stein Club on Peachtree
than to read about the D.T.s later
from Charles Bukowski

Oh, I almost forgot
Deacon reading at Tortillas and the White Dot --
I know you're still out there,
you big forget-me-not --
proclaimin' and bangin' that big iron shell
loud enough to drive the devil from hell
and every so often I can still hear you shout
"Lewis Grizzard I'm callin' you out!"

That's about it for now. In short
every one of us gets older
and if we're lucky to survive youth at all
we can try to be just a little bit bolder.


2/6/2009

Friday, May 8, 2009

Gary Snyder, born May 8 1930

Old Bones
Gary Snyder

Out there walking round, looking out for food,
a rootstock, a birdcall, a seed that you can crack
plucking, digging, snaring, snagging,

barely getting by,


no food out there on dusty slopes of scree—
carry some—look for some,
go for a hungry dream.

Deer bone, Dall sheep,
bones hunger home.


Out there somewhere
a shrine for the old ones,
the dust of the old bones,
old songs and tales.

What we ate—who ate what—
how we all prevailed.

Sunday, May 3, 2009

Jean Cocteau and "The Difficulty of Being," with Charlie Chaplin (1966)


Sometimes a writer needs to read (and heed) the printed word of those gone before, and who better to point the way than Jean Cocteau and the wisdom of Charlie Chaplin? Those long-gone, black-and-white days are hard to heed these days, but they are still vibrant for those with an ear to listen. From The Difficulty of Being by Jean Cocteau, and translated by Jean Sprigge (1995, Da Capo Press), here is a paradigm of personal style.

"I am neither cheerful nor sad. But I can be completely the one or the other to excess. In conversation, if I am in good form, I can forget the sorrows behind me, a pain I am suffering from, forget myself, so greatly do words intoxicate me and sweep ideas along with them. They come to me far better in solitude and, often, to write an article is torture, whereas I can speak it without effort. This frenzy of speech brings an impression of a facility I do not possess.

...
The white paper, the ink alarm me. I know they are in league against my will to write. If I succeed in conquering them, then my engine warms up, the word drives me and my mind functions. But it is essential that I should interfere as little as possible; that I should almost doze over it. The slightest consciousness of this process stops it.

And if I want to get it going again, I have to wait until the machinery chooses, and not try to persuade it by some trick.
One must not confuse intelligence, so adept at duping its man. with that other organ, seated we know not where, which informs us -- irrevocably -- of our limitations. ...



It is the power to revolve within this space that talent reveals itself. ... So long as what 's to be said is said, it's all one to me. All the same I have my method. This exists in being hard, economical in words, in rhyming my prose, in taking aim regardless of style, and hitting the bull's-eye at whatever cost. ...

I have heard Charles Chaplin deplore having left in his film The Gold Rush that dance of the bread rolls for which every spectator congratulates him. To him it is only a blot that catches the eye -- I have also heard him say (on the art of decorative style) that after a film he 'shakes the tree.' One must only keep, he added, what sticks to the branches."


As a writer I only hope to retain "what sticks to the branches," like leaves after an afternoon rain and the western wind in May.